RIP Blue
March 14, 200904.13.91 – 03.13.09
Blue was our family dog since 1992. I was still in the single digits when we got Blue, and he was there through the best of times and the worst of times. When I graduated from elementary school, high school, and college, when I did my first show, when my father died, when I released my first album, when I left New York, when I came back, when I was having girl troubles, and whenever I just needed a buddy… he was there through it all. Everybody knew Blue. He was an integral part of my life, and he’ll be missed. Rest in peace!
Official Statement on Chris Brown and Rihanna
February 26, 2009
I founded Hip Hop Is Not the Enemy two years ago in response to the media backlash against Hip Hop following the Don Imus controversy: an attention-seeking shock jock had made a racist and sexist comment about a female basketball team, and somehow it was our fault. That wasn’t to say criticisms against potentially inflammatory lyrics or symbolism on our part weren’t valid, but to act as though our culture was solely responsible for the existence of society’s ills was as irresponsible as it was disingenuous. In the literature for the initiative, I wrote: “[Our lyrics] are merely a reflection of the world we live in. It is therefore the world at large that needs to be examined.” Instead of advocating censorship or “cleaning up the lyrics” to sweep problems under the rug, I supported focusing on the problems themselves. To prove that the Hip Hop community was a part of the solution, I aimed for us to come together to raise money and awareness to fight domestic violence.
Why domestic violence?
For one, Hip Hop was being accused of fostering the environment that purportedly made the whole world — including out of touch old white men in cowboy hats, apparently — believe it to be socially acceptable to mistreat women in real life. This was, however, only one of the problems I envisioned Hip Hop Is Not the Enemy addressing (for instance, we later additionally set up relief funds for hurricane victims). The principal reason I wanted to start with domestic violence was because I had an emotional attachment to the issue. I made it no secret that a woman I loved was allegedly being abused. The single to my album was about the situation. Though not many people were discussing the topic in general, I did not consider it to be particularly erratic or inaccessible: one in four women will be abused by a partner in her lifetime. As someone who was feeling helpless from afar as a person I cared about was being violated, it positively boiled my blood to know that people were blaming it all on me.
Since its inception, Hip Hop Is Not the Enemy has accrued 200 members on Facebook, about 1,500 supporters on MySpace, and a few hundred dollars in donations to the National Coalition Against Domestic Violence. That may not sound like much, but it’s a start. I’m still committed to the cause and have long-term plans to turn the initiative into a full-fledged nonprofit organization. I worked closely with a few such organizations outside of DC over the last few years to better understand how they operate. I’m currently looking for people to get involved in a more serious capacity to take this cause to the next level.
With all that said, some may wonder why I have yet to officially comment on the situation that transpired before the Grammys that everyone is still talking about. I assure you that it has nothing to do with the fact that Chris Brown has sung my lyrics, or that I had a crush on Rihanna before she cut her hair. Above all, I’ve been witnessing all the gossip and felt I had nothing meaningful to add to the conversation. My efforts are about Hip Hop’s role in society, and neither of the artists in question are a part of Hip Hop — though they do have loose ties and one might expect the masses to associate them with our culture, perhaps due to their ages most seem to be correctly identifying them as proponents of pop culture instead. I am guilty of making inappropriate jokes amongst friends about rumors surrounding the cirumstances behind the dispute, but obviously hold the position that domestic violence itself is no laughing matter. That doesn’t change whether or not it involves singers, people we know in person, or whether or not it actually happened.
An important fact to keep in mind is that we don’t know what happened, and should not be making judgments against anyone until the case has been decided in a court of law. One of my core values is that everyone should be afforded due process and presumed innocent until proven guilty. I personally believe it should be illegal for newspapers to print stories about suspected criminals prior to their trials, because that affects the public perception. The jury pool is now tainted after the TMZ picture leaked, and a fair trial in this case may now be impossible.
Of course, the TMZ picture is the elephant in the room that I’ve been avoiding. Seeing that brought me back to the time when I was going through my personal situation, which was quite possibly the scariest time of my life. I literally felt my blood pressure rise when I saw that picture. It would not be unreasonable to assume that I’ve mostly been quiet about this situation because I did not want to relive that nightmare. Maybe that’s why people are usually quiet about domestic violence. Maybe it’s a good thing people are talking about it now that it involves figures so disconnected from their realities, but I have to admit: it bothered me that it took this happening to celebrities for people to start caring.
In any case, I know it’s easier to preach the importance of staying rational than it is to practice when emotions are involved. I wasn’t trying to hear about presumption of innocence when I was told someone was being abusive to the person I loved. I was trying to bypass the judge and the jury and kill him myself. But then, something happened. I saw his picture and realized he was human like me. He wasn’t the horned monster I was picturing. Somehow, I forgave him. I think people tend to put those we love and admire on a pedestal, and we view those who do things we don’t like as beneath us. The truth is that in the grand scheme of things we’re all so close to being on the same level that it’s probably insignificant. In no way am I trying to justify or excuse foul behavior, but I do know from experience that it’s best to at least try to let cooler heads prevail. Acting on impulse is what causes abusive situations to begin with.
So, no, I don’t think we should be rushing to crucify anyone.
There was talk on the radio here in New York about whether Chris Brown’s music should be banned from rotation. Let’s be very clear: The answer to that question is a resounding no. If TI could be convicted of buying machine guns and still have his music played all day, the radio station should frankly be embarrassed that they’d even bring up the possibility of banning someone for being accused of being involved in a domestic dispute.
This is a very serious issue, and I’m glad that people are expressing concern. Let’s just try to approach these situations with maturity and not let emotions get the best of us.
Rejected Super Bowl ad
February 8, 2009Obviously, people are outraged by this ad. Everyone I’ve spoken to has expressed anger at the church for producing this horrible commercial and trying to get it aired. I personally don’t think it’s that bad in principle: it’s really more pro-life than it is anti-choice, and I will always defend free speech. What’s most bothersome to me is that watching this ad gives one the impression that the church supported President Obama from the beginning, when the church was actually one of his biggest detractors. Now that he’s in office, we’re supposed to forget that they were on the wrong side of history? Newsflash: If you wanted someone to lose, trying to profit off that person’s victory makes you look like an asshole. It’s this kind of hyprocisy and underhandedness that turns so many people off to religion to begin with. Now, if they ran a spot about a fetus that would grow up a prick who cheated on his wife and used his mistress’ beer money to carpetbag his way to a congressional seat before eventually winning the Republican party’s nomination for president, they’d be fine.
If you didn’t know, I’m Catholic. If I’m harsh on the church, it’s because I’m disappointed in it. Shortly after the election, I was looking for a Catholic church to attend in Alexandria, Virginia. On one of the local church’s Web sites, they were encouraging parisioners to write into Obama’s office and protest his plan to sign what they deemed a bill that “promoted abortion” into legislation. No such pro-abortion bill existed. Claiming a bill that supports women’s rights promotes abortion is as disingenuous as suggesting pro-life legislation promotes unwanted children. Most people, regardless of political affiliation, do not favor abortion — but it’s disheartening when people fail to recognize the complexity of the issue.
Here’s something to think about. As of two years ago, there were an estimated one million Iraqi casualties in the Iraq War. Surely, that number is significantly higher now. With approximately 25 million people in Iraq in 2003, that equates to over 4% of that country’s population dead. And that only counts people we all agree were human beings; it doesn’t include the unborn babies of slain pregnant women, which increases the death toll even more if you’re religious. Does this qualify as genocide yet? Every time I attend mass, we’re asked to pray for the wars to end. This war in particular is one the entire world believes unjust. So if you’re the church, why not encourage your parisioners to thank President Obama for vowing to pull our troops out of Iraq instead of keeping the killing machine in place for an additional 100 years? That would mean more than the feigned support demonstrated in the rejected ad designed to scare people into following a political agenda adverse to what they voted for.
I have a feeling this is exactly why the founding fathers called for a separation of church and state. Religion and politics just don’t mix.
Reflections from the Inauguration
January 25, 2009
I came back from the inauguration fully expecting to write a recap as I do my shows and events. For some reason, I haven’t been able to. I’ve been unable to put what I’ve been feeling into words. My thoughts are scattered, so I won’t even try to organize them. I’ll just put them down as they come to me while I attempt to reflect on my experience.
Initially, I did not plan to attend the inauguration. I’ve never been to New Year’s Eve at Times Square, and that was about the atmosphere I was expecting: standing outside in the freezing cold for hours on end surrounded by millions of strangers. Not exactly my kind of fun. Then, something hit me two days prior. I think it may have been watching the pre-inaugural “We Are One” concert and feeling the electricity of all those in attendance. This is history. That’s a phrase I’m sure we’ve all used at some point during the election season, but a concept I personally didn’t completely grasp until the moment was upon us. Maybe, even after the election was over, I still didn’t believe it was actually happening. Was Barack Obama really about to become my president? After suffering through the Kerry defeat and four more years of Bush, surviving the ensuing downfall of all things American, following the subsequent two-year campaign with a watchful eye from the beginning, protesting injustices outside a racist news network, speaking and performing at voter rallies, volunteering my services and money for the cause, participating in the democratic process, and watching my fellow citizens declare the need for change, I decided there was no way in hell I was going to be anywhere but there when it finally happened. So I went.
EJ said, “You do know you’ll be freezing and watching it from a TV screen two miles away?” I didn’t care. I dressed warm.
As it turned out, despite the 20-something-degree weather, I wasn’t cold on the National Mall. I had on a t-shirt under my hoodie, under my winter coat which itself has a hood, with gloves and a winter hat, and ear warmers just in case. Being surrounded by over a million people (and being somewhat claustrophobic), I actually started to sweat and had to remove one or both hoods at various times. The ear warmers stayed in my pocket. Standing on a 45-degree incline on a hill near the base of the Washington Monument, it was a struggle to maintain solid footing, much less see anything besides other people, but none of that mattered. I was within earshot of it all, hearing the speeches as they were delivered. Hearing the entire crowd boo when the now ex-President Bush was announced, with one guy commenting that it was like being at a wrestling match. Hearing the first African American president being sworn in, and hearing his inaugural address as everyone stood silent and listened intently to every word.
Never before in my life had I shared a moment with so many people, and never again in my life will I see so many people unified — at that time, we really were one. There were no strangers. Could you believe it’s even possible for 1.5 million people to be in one place and none of them arrested? No major incidents. Everyone was polite to one another. There was plenty Obama memorabilia, but it wasn’t the flea market I thought it was going to be. No one tried to sell me a rap CD. Even the cops and soldiers on task were being courteous and not abusing their authority. This truly was history in the making, and I was never before more proud of my country.
History. It’s a word that gets thrown around so often that it’s a platitude. Come out to my next show; I’m going to make history on stage. My album will take its rightful place in the history of music. Never before in history has anyone been as great as me. I’m numb to it by now. This, however, is the type of history that will still be history generations from now. Where were you when Barack Obama became president? I was there. I was a part of history.
The journey wasn’t easy. Timid, who had just gotten back from rocking some shows in Seattle, decided to roll to DC alongside my female friend and I. I wish we had taken footage of him arguing with the hotel clerks, whose establishments had tried raising the prices of their rooms by 200% and higher to take advantage of the influx of visitors to the area that weekend. “I was just there like three months ago and paid half that,” “Does that price include in-room massage therapy and spa treatment,” “This isn’t very patriotic of you,” “These aren’t inauguration rates – this is called price gauging and it’s highly illegal,” “What is the name of your supervisor,” and the simple yet effective “Excuse me?” were just some of his responses. In the end, we stayed at a Travel Lodge for about $100 a night — less than what I usually pay for hotels on days when the first black president isn’t being inaugurated. Of course, you get what you pay for: the room was a smoking room that smelled like cigarettes, the pictures were falling off the walls, and the headboards were broken. There was no iron, so I had to press my pants with my girl’s blowdryer. A sharp contrast from the Mondrian in Los Angeles a few weeks back.
Staying on the Virginia side of DC, we actually got the better end of the bargain because the Metro station in Alexandria wasn’t too crowded on Tuesday morning. Some friends of ours were on the Maryland side, and they gave up trying to board a train. They woke up at 4:00 in the morning and couldn’t make it in; we got up at 8:30 and had no trouble getting into the city. Once we were there, it took us close to two hours to walk three blocks to the Mall. There were fences to jump and medians to climb. Upon encountering one, a dude humorously proclaimed, “No one told me there would be obstacles involved!” Some fainted and required medical attention. But getting out of the train station and making it up to the street was the hardest part. The DC Metro requires passengers to swipe their cards before and after riding the train, to calculate the appropriate fare. Having a million people exit the train station in single file just wasn’t happening, so they eventually decided to open the flood gates and let everyone make out with a free ride. This brought about cheers from the flock, but it was still no cake walk trying to get out of there.
A young woman on the train who was apparently from Sweden said, “I wish all citizens of the world could vote in American elections.” If that was allowed, I thought to myself, we’d never have a Republican president again. Maybe it wasn’t such a bad idea afterall.
Getting back after the ceremony also proved difficult. It seemed all 1.5 million people intended to board the Metro at L’Enfont Plaza. After seeing how ignorant the length of the line was, I concluded that I’d rather walk back across the Potomac River than wait. Others had the same feeling, as the pedestrians ruled the streets all afternoon. We marched through DC, passing an empty I-395 overpass with the Capitol on the horizon, and as I looked down onto the vehicle-free highway, I felt like I was living inside some sort of movie, or perhaps an episode of the Twilight Zone. A highway in DC without cars on it is unfathomable. My logic was that the farther away from the action we walked, the less crowded the train stations would become. Along the way, we tried picking up some food in a 7-11 that contained a queue of customers wrapped around the interior of the store and frustrated would-be patrons walking out with unpurchased pretzels and Slurpees. So much confusion. Better to wait till we got to the Chipotle back in Virginia. After approximately three hours of walking, we entered a Metro in an altogether different quadrant of DC than the one in which we started. We had to ride the train back to ground zero, but instead of getting off at L’Enfont and changing to the proper train line, we rode it out and took the long route to avoid the chaos that awaited the others.
Some strategic decisions and some dumb luck ensured that we made it to and from our destinations adequately. We were all back home in New York by midnight, and there was a new president in the White House. That night, one of my boys wrote on Facebook: “I’m so glad that I was on the right side of history. I’d hate to have to tell my grandchildren that I opposed this day.” I could not agree more with that sentiment. What a glorious time to be an American.
Since then, my whole perspective on life has changed. It might sound corny, but it’s the truth. Certain things just don’t seem to bother me anymore. Time will tell if that change is longlasting, or if I’m just on a temporary high. I can say for sure that I now have a clearer view of the big picture than I’d enjoyed in a long while. That this man is sitting in the Oval Office is tangible proof that all our dreams are within reach, that our setbacks do not endure. As of January 20, 2009, it’s no longer a cliché to assert that all things are possible if we believe.
And perhaps most importantly, the error of the past eight years has ended.
God bless America!
Timid’s video recaps after the jump…
Compare Pizon’s birthday with other rappers’
December 29, 2008
RIP, Pizon’s Personal Birthday Cake
12/2/08 – 12/02/08
As many of you know, I celebrated my birthday earlier this month. So it’s somewhat fitting that by pure coincidence, I just stumbled upon this site called Peepfolio that lists the birthdays of the “famous and infamous”… and I spotted myself on the Rappers page. Hopefully I belong to the former category, but either way it’s an honor to have my name included on such a relatively short list of rappers.
It also makes me feel good to realize I’m one of the youngest (a whole 10 years younger than Black Thought, Eminem, and Jermaine Dupri!).
Obama writes about “pussy” in his book
December 26, 2008

I’m just now reading his first memoir, Dreams from My Father, and I find it amusing due to the fact that being the next US president (and the first black one at that), he’s been forced to walk on eggshells. Catching a glimpse of his more “human” side from before he entered politics is refreshing.
And yes, he really does mention “pussy” in the book. It reassures me that I won’t be castrated for having used potentially offensive language when I get deeper into public service.
BlackBerry convo on this very important subject:
Dippi signed in.
Pizon: You read Obama’s books?
Dippi: naa
Dippi: books? You mean those things people read made of paper instead of screens?
Pizon: Lol
Pizon: I think it’s dope our next president has written about “pussy” in a book
Dippi: haha thats fuckin funny
Pizon: Talking about how someone told him to “get that pussy”
Dippi: clinton could only wish he could get away with being so upfront
Pizon: Yea I read Clinton’s book, he wasn’t that forthcoming at all
Pizon: Imagine Obama did his speeches like that tho
Pizon: “There is no black pussy, or white pussy. There is only United States pussy!”
Dippi: now that would be classic
Dippi: “now go out there, and get you some pussy!”
Pizon: “my opponent claims I want to redistribute the pussy wealth. But shouldn’t those with the least pussy be awarded the same pussy opportunities as the rest of us?”
Dippi: WORD UP
Dippi: im very for the pussy redistribution policy
Pizon: Haha but Joe the Porn Star wholeheartedly disagrees
Pizon: Even though he’s really Joe Six Inch and we all know he gets no pussy
Dippi: lol
Where’s the outcry against Jewish marriage?
November 20, 2008
Let me preface this by emphasizing that this isn’t an argument for or against gay marriage. This is an expression of cynicism towards the biblical argument against gay marriage. Most Christians in the United States believe in a literal interpretation of the Bible and tend to use that as the basis for their position. Putting aside the separation of church and state doctrine invoked by the Supreme Court since 1848, basing one’s position on scripture alone does not definitively lead to the conclusion that gay marriage should be illegal.
There is nothing in the Bible that even mentions same-sex marriage. While true that there is mention of ”standard” opposite-sex marriage, there are also numerous verses in support of polygamy (Exodus 21:10, Deuteronomy 21:15). This immediately breaks down the theory that “Marriage has always been defined under God as the union between one man and one woman.” Some argue that the New Testament rebukes the so-called injustices of the Old Testament, but Jesus Himself stated that no Old Testament law should be abolished (Matthew 5:17-18). In either case, it’s established that the definition of marriage throughout the Bible is not consistent. With regards to homosexuality, the scripture does suggest that those who engage in gay sex are sinful. This alone is not a sufficient condition to condemn gay marriage, because many other types of sinners are routinely married with no objection. In fact, the Bible teaches that every man is a sinner (Romans 3:23). Some might argue that the difference lies in the severity of the sin. If we’re to believe that all homosexuals go to Hell, that still doesn’t justify precluding them from marriage: “The one who does not believe [in Jesus] has been condemned already, because he has not believed in the name of the one and only Son of God” (John 3:18). Where’s the outcry against Jewish marriage?
Now, there are those who would claim that the reason Jews can get married but not gays is because marriage is associated with sex, so to allow gay marriage would somehow be condoning gay sex (alas, Jewish sex in itself is not a sin). As any married person would testify, associating marriage with sex probably isn’t the most valid notion. Being married does not require that sex is taking place. However, if sex is taking place, the Bible implies that it should only occur between married couples (1 Corinthians 7:8-9). So, disallowing those who engage in gay sex to marry actually leads them to more sin: they’re not only participating in the sinful act, but they’re doing so without being married. If gays were married, they might or might not have sex, but any sex they did have together wouldn’t be out of wedlock. From a biblical perspective, that has to be the preferred option. In fact, Christian values place emphasis on stability within the family structure: Jesus frequently spoke out against divorce (Luke 16:18, Mark 10:9-12, 1 Corinthians 7:10-13). A true Christian would want to encourage homosexuals to have that same stability, especially since it’d have the effect of containing — as opposed to spreading – their immoral act.
Furthermore, the passage most commonly used to condemn homosexuality is a blanket statement that casts judgment on any form of sex not lending itself to procreation (Genesis 38:9-10). Using the story of Onan “wasting his seed” as grounds for opposing gay marriage is logically equivalent to being against anyone who’s ever masturbated or received oral sex getting married. The same passage was cited by the church for ages to argue against the use of birth control. Recently, the Vatican relaxed its position, admitting that using condoms was preferable to having unprotected sex with an STD. Why? They realized that no matter what they said, people were going to have sex. The righteous position was therefore to preach responsibility. Similarly, there will always be gay people. A ban on gay marriage isn’t going to make gay people stop being gay. So shouldn’t it follow that the church would encourage gay people to be gay responsibly (with one committed partner)?
Again, this is not about whether gays should be allowed to marry. Obviously, I don’t believe there should be an outcry against Jewish marriage, either. I’m just using the hyperbole to demonstrate how the Christian perspective that uses the Bible as its sole point of reference to oppose gay marriage is faulty at best — even if we are to assume the scripture is true. It’s predicated on cherry-picking the passages that offer vague support to the position, then making objectionable presumptions about the text. Upon closer examination, it becomes apparent that it’s likely the position was taken first, and the Bible was scanned for ostensible evidence second.
As a side note, I find it ironic that Hip Hop has always self-identified as liberal, yet our lyrics most often champion homophobia, gun ownership, big business, and amassing a personal fortune at the expense of others. Maybe it’s time we looked in the mirror ourselves.
I’m still in shock.
November 5, 2008
“Why is Bush acting like he tryin’ to get Osama?
Why don’t we impeach him, and elect Obama?” -Common, 2004
When I heard those words four years ago on Jadakiss’ “Why” remix, I thought they were cute. To be perfectly honest, I thought the only reason the freshly elected Senator was mentioned in that couplet was because his name better rhymed with “Osama” then Hillary’s did. I also thought that impeaching Bush was a more realistic possibility than electing Obama any time in the near future. As inspired as I was by his red state-blue state speech at the Kerry convention, and as much as I would have liked to envision a country progressive enough to elect such a transformational figure, I just didn’t see it happening. This was, afterall, the same country that had just elected W. to a second term after starting an unjust war, violating the Geneva Convention, making a mockery of the United States Constitution, and stripping Americans of our civil liberties. Most people I talked to who voted for Bush in 2004 conceded those points but supported him on the grounds of “being a better Christian,” since he opposed gay marriage and abortion rights. While I myself am right-of-center as compared to other Democrats on those issues, Americans were haplessly letting them take precedence over preserving the very fabric of our civilization. In a sick twist of irony, America was increasingly resembling a Taliban state in the years following 9/11. Gone were the days of freedom and prosperity — they were replaced with periods of confusion, depression, fear, and ignorance, and a society that seemed hell bent on being duped by its government.
In February 2007, I wrote: ”What McCain has going for him is that of the four leading candidates, he’s the only white Protestant male (which every President besides JFK has been). Is that alone enough to win, even being the most similar to Bush, who currently has an all-time low approval rating of 34%? I hate to say it, but it might be.” Clearly, I did not have much faith in my country at that point. Given the prevailing political and social climate, I assumed it would come down to petty issues once more. As time went on and I saw the traction this man was picking up, my cynicism began to fade. It also took close to eight years of disastrous policy, but towards the end of Bush’s second term, the country on the whole began to feel its effects. The economy had been in a downward spiral for some time, but it took its literal collapse unto itself to fully awake the majority. Even by the end of the primary season, I realized that victory in November was inevitable. Still, what I’m feeling today is surreal. When you think of the moments in history that everyone will always remember, they tend to be tragic: when the bomb dropped on Hiroshima, when Kennedy and Dr. King were assassinated, when the Towers fell. It’s so encouraging that America finally has a proud moment of this magnitude to cherish forever.
A new day is upon us. Never before have I felt more fortunate to be alive, nor more optimistic for the future. God bless America!
Enter your password to view comments. |
Posted by Pizon
This caught so much traction on 


